ArgumentNo. 5/2013

About experiments and urban archaeologies. Bucharest

Abstract

This contribution aims to raise some questions about signs and symbols whose presence, appearance or disappearance, delimits landmarks and emotional experiments in urban area, or simply refers to the archaeology dictionary of city happenings.

Signs and symbols, statues and buildings – monuments – are an important part of cultural and emotional space, their appearance and disappearance mark our present, our passing by and spatial temporality, structuring the memories about the city. Many of them arise discussions, controversy, questions and debates. If those monuments treat the victory, power, commemoration, oriental crying of loss or a Balkan state, those are hypostasis they are emotionally and urban experiment that they propose to the city.

The perception of urban space rewards them with the due care of the experiment: transform them in accepted elements, or reject them, hiding them under forced names accordingly to their presence. Decomposing of the image is made on successive on layers, of points and textures (as unclear images) to lines, urban sequences and then, objects.

The visual acuity of the viewer depends on habit, the pleasure of contemplation and the ease of forming conscious link-image-thinking algorithms. The experimentation of an urban space is connected to landmarks, signs, background objects or closed human-scale objects identifying.

In an urban space like Bucharest , the landmarks are connected with the understanding of the atmospheres meanings, with the physically or emotionally browse of the place.

The marking of the space with evocative symbols is a particular type of urban experiment; The construction of the symbol, the moving or the replacement of it require a consume, an involvement and an assumption. (What happens when the symbol can not be moved, replaced, dislocated?)

Keywords: urban space, city, experiments, signs, landmarks,  archaeology, Bucharest .

Download


Related articles

Marina Mihăilă, Mihaela Ciolache, Raluca Pestisanu, Andra Giuglea, Mara Vasile, Ștefan Mihăilescu
Revisiting contemporary architecture as contribution: A guide of 21st century Bucharest (2018)

Marina Mihăilă, Cristina Enache
A discussion: (Framing) Motion pictures for architecture and critical architectural discourse – semantics and forms (2017)

Mihaela Zamfir (Grigorescu), Marina Mihăilă
Theme vs. architectural exercises: trends in contemporary architecture reflected by architectural design studio, years IV-V, School of architecture_UAUIM (2017)

Marina Mihăilă
#architecturemuseum – as Education Form (2016)

Marina Mihăilă, Cristian Bănică
House-housing – architecture design approach | 2 built case studies (2015)

Marina Mihăilă, Cristian Bănică
Thinking urban reconnection – architecture, research by design | case study - Mayfair development (2015)

Ștefan Mihăilescu, Marina Mihăilă, Mihaela Zamfir (Grigorescu)
3 case studies – a discussion on sustainable environment. (2014)

Marina Mihăilă
Urban memory. Continuity (2012)

Marina Mihăilă
About urban insertions and space discontinuities (2010)

Marina Mihăilă
ar(t)chitecture_art, imagination, perception, architecture_ (2009)