ro | en
Argument › Nr. 18/2026

Temporalitatea în modelarea arhitecturală. Către un cadru operațional în/cu timp

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.18.10

  • / Universitatea de Arhitectură şi Urbanism „Ion Mincu”, Bucureşti, RO

Rezumat

Problema timpului s-a aflat la baza gândirii arhitecturale de-a lungul secolelor, de la aliniamentele cosmologice și procesiunile ritualice din Antichitate, spațiile teatrale ale barocului, standardizarea timpului și a comportamentului din perioada modernității până la proliferarea diverselor instrumente de optimizare care simulează fizica clădirilor. Cu toate acestea, în etapa de proiectare, conceptele despre timp sunt reduse la metafore care leagă geometria statică de concepte temporale. Prima parte a acestei lucrări examinează abordările arhitecturale istorice privind timpul.

Partea a doua constituie o extrapolare, pornind de la tehnologia actuală, în special modelele de inteligență artificială (IA) de ultimă generație, precum și instrumentele imersive de reprezentare bazate pe realitate virtuală (VR), pentru a conceptualiza o abordare metodologică nouă care utilizează strategic timpul, spațiul și psihologia simulate, pentru a permite o interacțiune dinamică între proiectanți, ocupanți și spațiul fizic la diverse scări temporale. Susținem că acest lucru reprezintă o schimbare a modurilor de observare care va permite explorarea unor abordări importante de proiectare arhitecturală pe parcursul procesului de proiectare.

Cuvinte cheie

teorie arhitecturală, arhitectură temporală, metodologie de proiectare, proiectare asistată de IA, simulare în timp real, simularea reacțiilor umane

Download

Referințe

  1. Abdullah, A., Said, I., & Ossen, D. (2013). Zaha Hadid’s techniques of architectural form-making. Open Journal of Architectural Design, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12966/ojad.11.01.2013
  2. Al Bloushi, A. (2024). Models and artefacts / prompts and metaphors: Towards intentionality in AI-aided architectural design. Argument, 16, 2–24. https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.16.01
  3. Al Sayyed, H., & Al-Azhari, W. (2025). Investigating the role of biophilic design to enhance comfort in residential spaces: Human physiological response in an immersive virtual environment. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, Volume 6-2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1411425
  4. Alberti, L. B. (1991). On the art of building in ten books (J. Rykwert, N. Leach, & R. Tavernor, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1485)
  5. Alberti, L. B. (2005). On painting (C. Grayson, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1435)
  6. Banham, R. (1980). Theory and design in the first machine age. MIT Press.
  7. Becker-Asano, C. (2008). WASABI: Affect simulation for agents with believable interactivity [Doctoral dissertation].
  8. BIG Bjarke Ingels Group. (2010). Bjarke Ingels Group projects 2001–2010. Design Media Publishing Limited.
  9. Binz, M., Akata, E., Bethge, M., Brändle, F., Callaway, F., Coda-Forno, J., Dayan, P., Demircan, C., Eckstein, M. K., Éltető, N., Griffiths, T. L., Haridi, S., Jagadish, A. K., Ji-An, L., Kipnis, A., Kumar, S., Ludwig, T., Mathony, M., Mattar, M., … Schulz, E. (2025). A foundation model to predict and capture human cognition. Nature, 644(8078), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09215-4
  10. Birhane, A. (2021). The impossibility of automating ambiguity. Artificial Life, 27(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00336
  11. Birhane, A. (2022). Automating ambiguity: Challenges and pitfalls of artificial intelligence. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2206.04179
  12. Caballero, R. (2009). Form is motion: Dynamic predicates in English architectural discourse. In K.-U. Panther, A. Barcelona, & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 277–290). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.17cab
  13. Contreras Kallens, P., Kristensen-McLachlan, R. D., & Christiansen, M. H. (2023). Large language models demonstrate the potential of statistical learning in language. Cognitive Science, 47(3), e13256. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13256
  14. EnergyPlus. (2025). EnergyPlus. https://energyplus.net/
  15. Feng, J., & Li, Q. (2025). Investigate physiological and psychological responses to environment scenes, elements and components in different urban settings. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 3694. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86448-3
  16. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
  17. Fowler Davis, S., & Davies, M. (2025). Understanding the effects of social cohesion on social wellbeing: A scoping review. International Journal of Public Health, Volume 70-2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2025.1607414
  18. Hoppin, R. H. (1978). Medieval music. W. W. Norton.
  19. Jo, K., Choi, J., Kim, K., Kim, S., Nguyen, D.-L., Vo, X.-T., Priadana, A., & Tran, T.-D. (2025). Artificial behavior intelligence: Technology, challenges, and future directions. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.03315
  20. Jones, C. R., & Bergen, B. K. (2025). Large language models pass the Turing test. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23674
  21. Kim, S. (2025). Fundamental computational barriers prevent artificial intelligence from replicating human social cognition: A comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6931938/v1
  22. Kostof, S. (2010). A history of architecture: Settings and rituals (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  23. Kruft, H.-W. (1994). A history of architectural theory: From Vitruvius to the present (R. Taylor, E. Callander, & A. Wood, Trans.). Princeton Architectural Press.
  24. Kwinter, S. (2002). Architectures of time: Toward a theory of the event in modernist culture. MIT Press.
  25. Ladybug Tools. (2025). Ladybug Tools. https://www.ladybug.tools/
  26. Le Corbusier. (1986). Towards a new architecture (F. Etchells, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1931)
  27. Le Corbusier, Jeanneret, P., Boesiger, W., Stonorov, O., & Bill, M. (1995). Œuvre complète = complete works. Birkhäuser.
  28. Llinares, C., Nolé, M. L., Pérez-Martínez, M., Barranco-Merino, R., & Higuera-Trujillo, J. L. (2025). An exploratory neuroarchitecture study: Emotional responses to residential spaces using psychological and physiological indicators. Vitruvio: International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2025.24201
  29. MacDonald, W. L. (1982). The architecture of the Roman Empire (Rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
  30. Marsella, S., & Gratch, J. (2009). EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.005
  31. Miller, H. N., Thornton, C. P., Rodney, T., Thorpe, R. J., & Allen, J. (2020). Social cohesion in health: A concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 43(4), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000327
  32. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci. Rizzoli.
  33. OpenCFD. (2025, December 22). OpenFOAM. https://www.openfoam.com/
  34. Osuna, E., Rodríguez, L.-F., Gutiérrez-García, J. O., & Castro, L. A. (2020). Development of computational models of emotions: A software engineering perspective. Cognitive Systems Research, 60, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.11.001
  35. Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Rykwert, J. (2013). The idea of a town: The anthropology of urban form in Rome, Italy and the ancient world. Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1976)
  37. Schumacher, P. (2008). Parametricism as style—Parametricist manifesto. https://patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism%20as%20Style.htm
  38. Schumacher, P. (2016). Parametricism 2.0: Gearing up to impact the global built environment. Architectural Design, 86(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2018
  39. Scully, V. (1969). The earth, the temple, and the gods: Greek sacred architecture (Rev. ed.). Praeger.
  40. Serlio, S. (2001). Sebastiano Serlio on architecture (V. Hart & P. Hicks, Trans.). Yale University Press.
  41. Su, W. (2025). Do large language models (really) need statistical foundations? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.19145
  42. Tschumi, B. (1994a). Architecture and disjunction. MIT Press.
  43. Tschumi, B. (1994b). The Manhattan transcripts. Academy Editions. (Original work published 1981)
  44. Tschumi, B. (2005). Event-cities 3: Concept vs. context vs. content. MIT Press.
  45. Vitruvius. (1960). The ten books on architecture (M. H. Morgan, Trans.; Dover ed.). Dover Publications.
  46. Yang, S., Dane, G., van den Berg, P., & Arentze, T. (2024). Influences of cognitive appraisal and individual characteristics on citizens’ perception and emotion in urban environment: Model development and virtual reality experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102309
  47. Yegül, F. K., & Favro, D. G. (2019). Roman architecture and urbanism: From the origins to late antiquity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511979743
  48. Zevi, B. (1957). Architecture as space: How to look at architecture. Horizon Press.
  49. Zevi, B. (1978). The modern language of architecture. Australian National University Press.