ro | en
ArgumentNo. 17/2025

Signage and Perception in Dynamic Architectural Spaces

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.17.14

  • / “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest, RO
  • / “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest, RO
  • / “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest, RO
  • / “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest, RO

Abstract

This article explores signage design through an interdisciplinary lens, situated at the intersection of architecture, graphic design, perceptual psychology, and semiotics. The starting point is the case study of the Branding UAUIM visual identity project, through which the authors examine the concept of the “dynamic space” — a flexible, interactive, and continuously transforming environment, particularly characteristic of academic settings.

The approach goes beyond a purely technical analysis, addressing the architectural experience and the potential of simple visual elements to shape users’ expectations in their exploration of space. Perceptual dynamics are defined by the overlap between the mental image constructed a priori by the signage and the direct experience of physical space.

The methodology employed for this research incorporates theories of spatial interaction and perception, with emphasis on phenomenological approaches and models of adaptive spaces. The research is structured on three levels: theoretical — presenting key concepts; methodological — detailing the research methods used; and applicative — offering case studies and concrete examples.

The conclusions highlight that signage not only facilitates spatial orientation but also plays a vital role in constructing an iconographic identity of space. In the academic context, the graphic component of signage should not be seen merely as a functional tool for managing everyday mobility, but also as a means of fostering a sense of belonging and continuity. Thus, the article demonstrates that signage systems function as active hermeneutic mechanisms, shaping both the interpretation and the experience of space in a meaningful way.

Keywords

dynamic space, signage design, visual identity, minimalism, semiotics, semiotics, anticipatory perception, spatial mental model

Download

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology (A. Lavers & C. Smith, Trans.). Hill and Wang.
  2. Bierut, M. (2015). How to use graphic design to sell things, explain things, make things look better, make people laugh, make people cry, and (every once in a while) change the world. Harper Design.
  3. Cheng, K. (2020). Designing type (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
  4. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
  5. Eco, U. (1996). The authors and his interpreters. Lecture at the Italian Academy of Advanced Studies in America, Columbia University, New York.
  6. Fransecky, R., Debes, J. (1972). Visual literacy – A Way to learn – A way to teach. AECT Publications.
  7. Frascara, J. (2004). Communication Design: Principles, Methods, and Practice. New York: Allworth Press.
  8. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
  9. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  10. Kant, I. (1786). Was heißt: Sich im Denken orientieren? În Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. 8, pp. 131–147). De Gruyter. (Lucrare originală publicată în 1786, retipărită în 2011).
  11. Klinkenberg, J.-M. (2004). Inițiere în semiotica generală. București: Institutul European.
  12. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
  13. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
  14. Norman, D. (2023). Design for a better world: Meaningful, sustainable, humanity centered. MIT Press.
  15. Meggs, P. B. (1983). A history of graphic design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  16. Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  17. Panait, A. Ioniță, B., Baroncea, J., Gălățianu, C., Voica, M. (2024). B:ID UAUIM 3.0 - Branding și identitate vizuală în Universitatea de Arhitectură și Urbanism Ion Mincu. Editura UAUIM. https://editura.uauim.ro/pub/eim-632-184.pdf.
  18. Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Rand, P. (2014). Thoughts on design. Chronicle Books.
  20. Samara, T. (2020). Making and breaking the grid: A graphic design layout workshop (2nd ed.). Rockport Publishers.
  21. Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Duckworth. (Original work published 1916).
  22. Spiekermann, E. (2013). Stop stealing sheep & find out how type works (3rd ed.). Adobe Press.
  23. Vignelli, M. (2010). The Vignelli canon. Lars Müller Publishers.
  24. Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71-88). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Related articles

Andra Panait, Alina Stoica, Cristina Mândrescu, Traian Colțan-Dima
Living in Common Courtyards - Two Morphological and Spatial Hypostases. Contemporary Interventions in a Historic Minor Fabric (2024)

Angelica Stan, Andra Panait
Distance and Distancing in Public Urban Spaces During the Covid-19 Pandemic Period (2022)

Andra Panait, Elena Cristina Mândrescu, Traian Colțan
The Versatility of Public Space. The Historical Center of Bucharest (2021)

Andra Panait
Three architects, three methods - A comparative analysis (2012)