ro | en
ArgumentNo. 14/2022

Distance and Distancing in Public Urban Spaces During the Covid-19 Pandemic Period

  • / Prof. Phd. Arch., habil. Urbanism, “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO
  • / assoc. prof. PhD. Arch., “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO


Distance has insinuated itself into our lives and has turned into a very present “character” of the times we live in. We have become not only more suspicious but also more cautious with regard to consumption, occupancy, and communication in public spaces, viewing them through the filter of distancing. The transformations of the physical and mental distance imposed at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic are correlated with those induced by the widespread use of communication technology and geospatial location. Cities are now “impregnated” with a new behavioural dimension in relation to distance, which seems to be the same for all, but is in fact unique to each of us.

A new type of relationship is developing from the way in which multiple hybrid forms of distance are appearing between the social distancing imposed by the authorities to limit the spread of the pandemic and the mental, escapist distance facilitated by the permanent use of technology.

For architecture, distance is a foundation both for the conception and for the design of urban space. However, distance is also one of the factors that decisively influence the experience of urban space, and the pandemic has made even more obvious the fact that architecture does not exist in the absence of perception and of its direct use by humans.

This paper shows the architects’ reaction to the reigning spatial dystopia and the way in which a new type of “distance-behaviour-proximity” acts through different instances as an active multi-layered ingredient of everyday urban life that influences its quality. The main landmarks of the new spatial language of distance and distancing in cities are presented, showing that distancing as a postpandemic phenomenon has affected and continues to affect people’s behaviour and perceptions and that it also influences architects in reconsidering distance as a conceptual tool in the design of the built environment.


distance, proximity, liminality, behaviour, language



  1. Askarizadab, R., Jinliaoa, H., Jafaric, S. (2021). The influence of COVID-19 on the societal mobility of urban spaces. Cities, 119, 103388,
  2. Beech, N. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), (pp. 285-302). doi:10.1177/0018726710371235
  3. Cheval, S., Adamescu, M., C., Georgiadis, T., Herrnegger, M., Piticar, A., Legates, D.R. (2020). Observed and Potential Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2:17 (11), (pp.78-81).
  4. Debord, G. (1970, 2006). Societatea spectacolului. (C. Savoiu, Trans.) București: Ed. Rao.
  5. Economu, M. (2020). Social Distance in COVID-19: Drawing the line between protective behavior and stigma manifestation. Psychiatrik Journal, 20;32(3), (pp.183-186). doi:10.22365/jpsych.2021.025
  6. Fatmi, M. R. (2020). COVID-19 impact on urban mobility. Journal of Urban Management. 9(3), (pp.270-275).
  7. Fratesi, U.,  Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). The crisis and regional employment in Europe: what role for sheltered economies? Economy and Society, 9(1), (pp.33-57).
  8. Honey-Rosés, J., Anguelovski I., Chireh K., V., Daher, C., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C., Litt, S. J., Mawani, V., McCall, M., K. l, Orellana, A., Oscilowicz, E., Sánchez, U., Senbel, M., Tan, X., Villagomez, E.k, Zapata, O.  Nieuwenhuijsen, J M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions – design, perceptions and inequities. Cities & Health, 5(1), (pp.263-279). doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
  9. Hunter, M. (2021). Resilience, Fragility, and Robustness: Cities and COVID-19. Urban Governance, 16:16. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.004.
  10. Iordache, D.D., Barbu, M. (2021). Analiza comparativă a trei platforme de e-Learning utilizate de către studenți în perioada pandemiei de COVID-19. Revista Română de Informatică și Automatică, 31(4), (pp.55-66). doi: 10.33436/v31i4y202105
  11. Jens, K., Gregg J. S. (2021). The impact on human behaviour inshared building spaces as a result of COVID-19 restrictions. Building Research & Information 49:8, (pp. 827-841).
  12. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, Space and Architecture, London: Praeger Publishers.
  13. Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of the Total Environment, 749.10:1016, (pp. 123-128).
  14. Shaobo, K. Zhang, Z., Liu, Y. Ng, S (2021). The closer I am, the safer I feel: The distance proximity effect of COVID-19 pandemic on individuals' risk assessment and irrational consumption. Psychology and Marketing. 2021:38, (pp. 2006-2018).
  15. Tricarico, L., De Vidovich, L. (2021). Proximity and post-COVID-19 urban development: Reflections from Milan, Italy. Journal of Urban Management, 10, (pp. 302-310).
  16. Toth, K., Subramanium, M. (2003). The Persona Concept: A Consumer-Centered Identity Model. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop of Requirements Engineering for High Assurance Systems (RHAS), Monteray bay, California, (pp. 89-92).
  17. Wayland, S. (2021). Liminality and COVID-19 – what do we already know? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30:1, (pp. 1291-1292). doi: 10.1111/inm.12909

Related articles

Andra Panait, Elena Cristina Mândrescu, Traian Colțan
The Versatility of Public Space. The Historical Center of Bucharest (2021)

Angelica Stan
Some observations on how danube is reflected in the minds of its inhabitants. A Romanian Case Study: Lower Danube, Giurgiu City (2019)

Angelica Stan
Urban park - from concept to project (2015)

Andra Panait
Three architects, three methods - A comparative analysis (2012)