ro | en
ArgumentNo. 14/2022

Religion and Architecture. Exploring contemporary Buddhism in the Wat Rong Khun Temple in Thailand

  • / stud., University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, PH


Forms of religious architecture such as temples serve as a testament to people’s ability to create and construct meanings related to faith and spirituality. In Buddhism, temples are holy grounds for meditation and spaces where different symbols, icons, and imagery meet. In 1997, the Wat Rong Khun temple in Thailand was opened to visitors. This paper examines the materiality, materialization, and the subsequent perception of the White Temple as art through the analysis of its visual semiotics and of its context. Important perceptions of the Buddhist faith such as the samsara and the trikaya are reviewed and related to the temple structure. The four elements and parts of the architecture are the focus of this study: the golden building, the bridge of the cycle of rebirth, the gates of heaven, and the Ubosot or the principal building. The analysis reveals that the material and its specific image, as well as its materialization are used to reflect religious perspectives, predominantly through the combination of materials with intrinsic meanings such as concrete, wood and glass as well as through the juxtaposition of the two key colors: gold and white. The intermingling of different materials and of symbolism from different religions, folk beliefs, and popular culture connotes the unity of the past and the present. The nature of contemporary Buddhism as eclectic, syncretic and hybrid is observed throughout the “unlimited semiosis” of the temple. Hence, the Wat Rong Khun temple in Thailand serves as a prominent example of architectural experimentation using both material and perception to communicate perspectives of contemporary Buddhism in today’s world.


contemporary Buddhism, eclectic architecture, hybridity, syncretism, Thai Buddhism, unlimited semiosis, iconic power



  1. Capistrano-Baker, F. (2008). Locating Authenticity: Is this Asian Dress? In M. Hayashi & K. Maeda (Eds.), Count 10 Before You Say Asia: Asian Art after Postmodernism. Japan Foundation.   
  2. Cohen, R. (2006). Beyond Enlightenment. Taylor & Francis.
  3. D’Amato, M. (2003). The semiotics of signlessness: A Buddhist doctrine of signs. Semiotica, 2003(147), (pp.185-207). https://
  4. De La Paz, C. (2012). The potency of poon: religious sculpture, performativity, and the Mahal na Senyor of Lucban. The spirit of things: materiality and religious diversity in Southeast Asia, (pp. 183-96).
  5. Guillermo, A. G. (2001). Reading the Image. Image to Meaning: Essays on Philippine Art, 1-16.
  6. Hackett, C., Grim, B., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potančoková, M., & Abel, G. (2012). The global religious landscape. Pew Research Center.
  7. Harvey, P. (2012). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Klokke, M. I. (2008). The Buddhist temples of the Śailendra dynasty in Central Java. Arts asiatiques, 63, (pp. 154-167). Kobayashi, S. (2008). Reconstructing Buddhist Temple Buildings. People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Religion, Power and Moral Order in Cambodia Today, (43), (p. 69).
  9. Kusalasaya, K. (1965). Buddhism in Thailand: Its past and its present. Wheel Publication.
  10. Murphy, S. A., & Revire, N. (2014). Sema stones in lower Myanmar and northeast Thailand: A comparison. Before Siam: Essays in Art and Archaeology, (pp. 352-371).
  11. O'Connor, R. A. (2009). Place, Power and People: Southeast Asia's Temple Tradition. Arts Asiatiques, 64, (pp. 116-123). Pandey, R. (2005). Desire and disgust: Meditations on the impure body in medieval Japanese narratives. Monumenta Nipponica, 60(2), (pp. 195-234).
  12. Patterson, M. (2020). Architecture as performance art: evaluating “iconic power” in the development of two museums. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(2), (pp. 158-190).
  13. Peacock, J. (2008). Suffering in mind: The aetiology of suffering in early Buddhism. Contemporary Buddhism, 9(2),(pp. 209-226).
  14. Pope, A. (2011). Modern materialism through the lens of Indo-Tibetan Buddhism. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30(1-2), (pp. 171-177).
  15. Runra, P., & Sujachaya, S. (2019). Tradition and Creativity of the Rahu Symbol in Buddhist Temples: Case Study of Paintings, Sculptures and Amulets in Central and East of Thailand, Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 22(2), (pp. 222-253). doi: https://
  16. Skorupski, T. (2016). Buddhist Permutations and Symbolism of Fire. Homa Variations. The Study of Ritual Change across the Longue Durée, (pp. 67-125).
  17. Snelling, J. (1989). The Buddhist Handbook: A Complete Guide to Buddhist teaching, practice, history and Schools. Rider. Strong, J. S. (1998). [Review of On Being Buddha: The Classical Doctrine of Buddhahood, by P. J. Griffiths]. The Journal of Religion, 78(3), (pp.462–464).
  18. Trainor, K. (Ed.). (2004). Buddhism: The illustrated guide. Oxford University Press, USA.
  19. Yogi, P. G. (1999). The Doctrine of the Kaya (Trikaya). In A. S. Gyatso, R. Ngodup & T. Tenzing (Eds.). Bulletin of Tibetology (Vol. 35, No. 1-3, pp. 14-37). Namgyal Institute of Tibetology.

Related articles

Andre Magpantay
Revolution. Contextual Image Analysis and Characterization of Post-Pandemic Architectural Style and Design (2021)