ro | en
Argument › No. 16/2024

Hibrid Architecture. The Place for Social Interaction

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.16.17

  • / “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO

Abstract

Nineteenth-century challenges such as intensive land use, densification, revitalization, economic feasibility are prerequisites and recurring conditions for the development of hybrid architectural ensembles or objects - accessibility in a short time to a variety of functions implies efficient land use, which together with facilitating pedestrian activity leads to economic viability and a high sense of security.

The notion of mixed uses is becoming increasingly popular as a strategy for improving the quality of the urban environment. The objective of this study is to analyze the multiple implications generated by hybrid architecture, both urban and social, by promoting human interaction.

Keywords

hybridisation, hybrid, functional mix, social interaction, urbanity, urban catalyst

Download

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1997). Semiology and the urban. În N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking architecture: A reader in cultural theory (p. 163). Routledge.
  2. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Adaptability. În Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/ english/adaptability
  3. Caso, O., & Cavallo, R. (2013, 23.03). Hybrid Buildings Celebrate the Collective Realm: Design Research at the TU Delft. International EAAE Conference-Workshop-Exhibition Educating the Future: Architectural Education in the International Perspective, Istanbul, Turcia.
  4. Di Marino, Tabrizi, H. A., Chavoshi, S. H., & Sinitsyna, A. (2022). Hybrid cities and new working spaces – The case of Oslo. Progress in Planning, 170, article 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2022.100712 
  5. Fenton, J. (1985). Hybrid Buildings. Pamphlet Architecture, 11, 41.
  6. Fentzloff, K. (2019). Die Debatte zur sozial-ökologischen Transformation. Konzepte des ›Guten Lebens‹ am Beispiel genossenschaftlich organisierter Wohnformen. Universität Wien.
  7. Fernandes Per, A., & Mozas, J. (2020). 50 Hybrid Buildings. Catalogue on the Art of Mixing Buildings. a+t architecture publishers.
  8. Fernandes Per, A., Mozas, J., & Arpa, J. (2011). This is Hybrid. a+t architecture publishers.
  9. Fischer, G.-N. (1992). Psihologia socială a mediului.
  10. Gasser, M., zur Brügge, C., & Tvrtkovic, M. (2014). Stadt, Quartier, Haus. În Raumpilot. Arbeiten (3. Auflage, pp. 67-96). Wüstenrot Stiftung.
  11. Holl, S. (2011). Prologue. În This is Hybrid. a+t architecture publishers.
    Ikeda, S. (2024). A City Cannot Be a Work of Art. Learning Economics and Social Theory From Jane Jacobs. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
  12. Jacobs, J. M. (1999, March 13). Hybrid highrises. Paper presented at Debating the City: City Living and Cosmopolitanism, Museum of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  13. Koolhaas, R. (1994). Delirious New York. A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. The Monacelli Press.
  14. Ochinciuc, C. V. (2002). Conceptul Devoltarii Durabile in Arhitectura: Proiectarea integrata. Editura Universitara ”Ion Mincu”.
  15. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Marlow &Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9561417 

Related articles

Irina Mihaela Moise
Inflatable architecture. Short critical history of uses in architecture (2023)