ro | en
Argument › No. 15/2023

Ambiguity and exposure: darkness as material in visionary architecture

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.15.06

  • / Holon Institute of Technology, Israel, IL

Abstract

Light and its adjunct ocular phenomena – darkness, cannot be isolated from a discussion regarding materiality in architecture. The multiple appearances of the material depend entirely upon the quality of light or lack of light. Thise paper explores unique material attributes of darkness and the way they translate into emotional and psychological concepts. These include ideas related to dreams, identity, revolution, the experimental, and dystopia. Thise paper utilizes visionary architecture propositions as the bases for their analysis and exploration.

Darkness encompasses unwanted misinterpretations, exasperating roadblocks, and hidden perils. Conversely, darkness provides a nurturing space for resolving unresolved matters, breaking societal taboos, and confronting internal struggles that both torment and ignite the human soul. The absence of visibility does not diminish comprehension, but instead reveals new perspectives and emotions that remain hidden to the visible world.

Visionary architecture, often unrealized and occasionally impossible to construct, encompasses provocative architectural ideas that challenge or offer alternatives to the prevailing norms. It provides architects with the freedom to express themselves in experimental and inquisitive ways, distinct from the act of constructing or writing theoretical texts. Liberated from the constraints of practicality, it opens avenues for exploring human emotions and contemplating futuristic possibilities. However, by introducing ambiguous realities, it also unveils new prospects for innovative concepts in tangible architecture.

Visionary architecture uses darkness to explore conceptual understandings which the concrete cannot explain. Drawing on multiple visionary architecture examples, supported by relevant theoretical interpretations, the paper articulates the typology of darkness within the realm of visionary architecture. The paper contends that the use of darkness is imperative today no less than at any time in the past. Although contemporary technology can decipher mysteries of the universe and the body, still the ambiguity of creativity, emotion, eroticism, the unfinished, and death can be reconciled mainly by the use of darkness.

Keywords

Visionary Architecture, Darkness, Materiality, Architectural Representation

Download

References

  1. Battisti, E. (1998). Utopia in Uncertainty (R. Williamson, Trans.) Utopian Studies, 9 (no. 1), 149–55.
  2. Bar-Eli, A. (2011). On the Non-Complete in Visionary Architecture. Berlin. LAP Academic Publishing.
  3. Bingham, N., Clare C., Peter C., & Wilson, R. (2004). Fantasy Architecture: 1500-2036. London. Hayward Gallery/Royal Institute of British Architects.
  4. Chapman, M. (2007). Architecture and Hermaphroditism: Gender Ambiguity and the Forbidden Antecedents of Architectural Form. Queer Space: Center and Peripheries, 1-7.
  5. Coleman, N.(2005). Utopias and Architecture. USA. Routledge.
  6. Collins, G. R. (1979). Visionary Drawings of Architecture and Planning: 20th Century through the 1960s. Art Journal, 244–256.
  7. Dagsson, J. (2021). Comparison in/of darkness in Darkness. In The Dynamics of Darkness in the North. eds Chartier, D., Lund, K.A., and Jóhannesson, G.T. Montréal and Reykjavík: Imaginaire | Nord and Land-og ferðamálafræðistofa/Research
    Centre in Geography and Tourism at the University of Iceland (Isberg). 105-27.
  8. Duboy, P. (1987). Lequeu: An Architectural Enigma. Great Britain. The MIT Press.
  9. Dunster, D. (2005). Walter Pichler. Architectural Design, 75 (no. 4), 86–91.
  10. Evans, R. (1997). Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays. London. Architectural Association.
  11. Grütter, J.K. (2020). Basics of Perception in Architecture. Wiesbaden. Springer.
  12. James, P. (2008). Walter Pichlers House Next to the Smithy: Atmosphere and Ground. Architectural Design 78(no. 3), 60–63.
  13. Kafka, F. (2009). The Castle (A. Bell, Trans.). United-States. Oxford University Press. (original work published 1926) Retrieved January 1, 2023, from https://libcom.org/files/Franz%20Kafka-The%20Castle%20(Oxford%20World%27s%20Classics)%20(2009).pdf
  14. Kaufman, E. (1949). Jean-Jacques Lequeu. The Art Bulletin 31(no. 2), 130–35
  15. Klotz, H. (Ed.). (1990). Paper Architecture: New Projects from the Soviet Union (ed). USA. Rizzoli.
  16. Levy, I. (2017). The Passion of the Gaze. Tel-Aviv. Resling. [in Hebrew]
  17. Miller, A. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time and the Beauty That Causes Havoc. New York. Basic Books.
  18. Nesbitt, L. (2003). Brodsky and Utkin: The Complete Works. New ed. New York; Abingdon. Princeton Architectural; Marston.
  19. Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin. Great Britain. Wiley-Academy.
  20. Pérez-Gómez, A. (1992). Polyphilo, or, The Dark Forest Revisited: An Erotic Epiphany of Architecture. London. MIT Press.
  21. Saito, Y. (1997). The Japanese Aesthetics of Imperfection and Insufficiency. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55(no.4), 377–85.
  22. Small, I. (2007). Piranesi's Shape of Time. Image & Narrative [e-journal], 18. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from http://www.imageandnarrative.be/thinking_pictures/small.htm
  23. Spiller, N. (1998). Digital Dreams: Architecture and the New Alchemic Technologies. London. Ellipsis.
  24. Spiller, N. (2006). Deformography: The Surreal Poetics of Cybridised Architecture. Papers of Surrealism (4), 1-20.
  25. Spiller, N. (2007). Visionary Architecture: Blueprints of the Modern Imagination. London. Thames & Hudson.
  26. Stec, B. (2020). Sunlight, Atmosphere and Architecture. Kraków. AFM Publishing House.
  27. Steil,L. (2014). The Architectural Capriccio: Memory, Fantasy and Invention. Manchester, UK. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
  28. Sun, Y. (2023). The Desire to See: Binary Systems, Architectural Space, and the Ontology of Being-with. Cultural Critique 118, 1-22. doi:10.1353/cul.2023.0007.
  29. Tafuri, M. (1987). The Sphere and the Labyrinth: Avant-Gardes and Architecture from Piranesi to the 1970s. Cambridge, Massachusetts. MIT Press.
  30. Tanizaki, J. (2013). In Praise of Shadows (D. Choen, Trans.). Israel. Asia [in Hebrew]. (original work published 1933)
  31. Vesely, D. (2004). Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question Of. London, England. MIT Press.