ArgumentNo. 1/2009

Is architecture a fashion?

Abstract

An analysis between architecture and fashion might seem useless from an architectural point of view, since it is plainly obvious that architecture is first and foremost a form of art, meaning something born out of motivations more profound than those of simple adherence to a fashion, or short-lived trend.

In order to better understand the relationship between architecture and fashion and compare them, a definition of both terms is essential. You will undoubtedly observe the inclusion of the term social in both definitions, which indicates, at least at this level, a connection between art and fashion, since they both reflect the specificities of social organizations.

Starting from these two working definitions, the article will show that a demonstration of the opposition between art and fashion through which we hoped to rid architecture of fashion’s tyranny, at least on a theoretical level, is not nearly as simple as initially expected, and that is because of the still uncertain statute of contemporary art.

Download


Related articles

Ioan Miloș
Upgrade with “fascist” traces in the reunification’s Berlin (2012)

Ioan Miloș
The ethics of psichological manipulation with references to the architect-client rapport (2009)