When Time Designs Domestic Space. An Exploration of Dysfunctional Habitats
https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.18.07
- Mariabruna Fabrizi / ENSA Paris-Est, France
Abstract
From the 19th century onwards, housing units increasingly embodied functional layouts designed to accommodate the strict daily routines of a normative family, an evolution driven both by the taylorisation of domestic space and by growing hygienic and comfort concerns. Contemporary dwelling layouts continue to follow largely simplified functionalist logics, despite progressive mutations of family structures and the new requirements due to environmental considerations. The article argues that designing housing units with temporal notions other than the daily schedule in mind could produce dwellings that are better able to respond to contemporary needs, while also introducing new conceptual and spatial dimensions to the flow of life within domestic space. The article analyses a selection of dwellings built in the 20th and 21st centuries that consider time in different ways: as seasonality, as in the Latapie House by Lacaton & Vassal; as life–and family–stage evolution, as in Walden 7 by Taller Bofill; and as an overlap of work time and personal time, as in the Amphitheater House by Aristide Antonas. The buildings are analysed in terms of plan distribution, articulation of volumes, and materiality to understand how their design and construction embody specific notions of time that differ from conventional daily patterns. Each case study is compared with a vernacular housing type that interprets the same notion of time. Eventually, each of the three examples demonstrate an ability to accommodate evolving uses and ways of living, while paving the way for a substantial reconsideration of the organisation of contemporary housing units.
Keywords
time, housing, functionalism, habitat
Download
References
- Aboudan, F., & Hacihasanoglu, O. (2018). The traditional courtyard house in Aleppo and its correlation with sustainable conceptions. Megaron, 13(3), 415–429. DOI: 10.5505/megaron.2018.86486
- Alafandi, R., & Abdul Rahim, A. (2017). The legacy of Aleppine Ottoman houses. International Journal of Heritage Architecture, 1(3), 388–400. DOI: 10.2495/HA-V1-N3-388-400
- Arce, R., Bustamante, M., & Alonso-Rodriguez, M. (2025). Revisitando Walden 7: Soluciones para la célula de vivienda contemporánea. VLC Arquitectura: Research Journal, 12, 9–31. DOI: 10.4995/vlc.2025.21894
- Banham, M., & Barker, P. (Eds.). (1996). A critic writes: Essays by Reyner Banham. University of California Press.
- Borsi, K., Finney, T., & Philippou, P. (2018). Architectural type and the discourse of urbanism. The Journal of Architecture, 23(7–8), 1093–1103. DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2018.1513478
- Colomina, B. (2019). X-ray architecture: How an obsession with illness shaped modern architecture. Lars Müller Publishers.
- De Zurko, E. R. (1957). Origins of functionalist theory. Columbia University Press.
- Douglas, M. (1991). The idea of a home: A kind of space. Social Research, 58(1), 287–307.
- Eleb, M., & Debarre, A. (1995). L’invention de l’habitation moderne: Paris 1880–1914. Hazan.
- Engels, F. (1988). The housing question. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works (Vol. 23, 317–391). International Publishers. (Original work published 1872)
- Fijalkow, Y. (2022). The notion of housing need in France: From norms to negotiations (19th–21st centuries). Urban Planning, 7(1), 197–206. DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i1.4706
- Hodder, I., & Ritchey, T. (1996). Re-opening Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (Ed.), On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–1995 (Vol. 22, 1–18). British Institute at Ankara.
- Izumida, H. (2011). Machiya: A typology of Japanese townhouses. In 1st TTCL Annual Symposium (44–49). Toyohashi University of Technology.
- Klein, A. (1928). The functional house for frictionless living. In C. Bauer (Ed.), Modern housing (1934, 203).
- Lacaton, A. (2003). We don’t much believe in form [Interview by N. Bijelić, S. Bradić, & V. Grimmer]. Oris, 24, 109–131.
- Lacaton, A., & Vassal, J.-P. (Eds.). (2024). It’s nice today: On climate, comfort, and pleasure. Ruby Press.
- Lopes Dias, T. (2022). A experiência Walden 7: A habitação coletiva como pluralização do não convencional. Revista Proyecto, 82–99. DOI: 10.12795/ppa.2022.i27.05
- Meyer, H. (1928). Bauen. Bauhaus: Zeitschrift für Gestaltung, 2, 12–13.
- Moyano, N. (2004). Walden 7: Taller de Arquitectura. Col·legi d’Arquitectes de Catalunya.
- Nisonen, E., Milián Bernal, D., & Pelsmakers, S. (2025). The unfitness of dwellings: Why spatial and conceptual boundaries matter. Buildings and Cities, 6(1), 619–633.
- Pallasmaa, J. (1995). Identity, intimacy and domicile: Notes on the phenomenology of home. In N. D. Benjamin (Ed.), The home: Words, interpretations, meanings and environments (131–147). Ashgate.
- Park, J. (2019). One hundred years of housing space standards: What now? http://housingspacestandards.co.uk/assets/space-standards_onscreen.pdf
- Pelsmakers, S., & Warwick, E. (2022). Housing adaptability: New research, emerging practices and challenges. Buildings and Cities, 3(1), 605–618. DOI: 10.5334/bc.266
- Perec, G. (1974). Species of spaces and other pieces (J. Sturrock, Trans.). Penguin.
- Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A Short History of an Idea. Viking.
- Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness, convenience: The social organisation of normality. Berg.
- Spoormans, L. (2018). Adapting traditional Machiya to a contemporary lifestyle. In M.-T. van Thoor & S. Stroux (Eds.), Heritage, history and design between East and West: A close-up on Kyoto’s urban fabric (83–99). Delft University of Technology.
- Steadman, S. R. (2016). Archaeology of domestic architecture and the human use of space. Routledge.
- Zeifman, E. (2023). The five points of Lacaton & Vassal. Log (58), 72–79.