ro | en
ArgumentNo. 16/2024

Form Follows Function in Victorian Asylums. The Impact on Adaptive Reuse Potential

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.16.08

  • / “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University, "G.M. Cantacuzino" Faculty of Architecture, Iași, RO

Abstract

During the Enlightenment, social reformers embarked on a mission to transform various societal institutions, including schools, medical hospitals, prisons, and insane asylums. These institutions underwent significant changes in order to reflect the values of novelty, rationality, and increased prominence in society. Among these newly shaped institutions, the insane asylum emerged as a significant presence in nineteenth-century daily life. This paper delves into the early embodiment of the architectural principle “form follows function” in Victorian asylums, illustrating how this concept, though not formally articulated, profoundly influenced the layout and subsequent repurposing of these institutions. The notion that function dictates form was pivotal in envisioning the architectural design of Victorian asylums, foreseeing their integral connection to the purpose and operational aspects of mental health care facilities. During the 19th century, the proliferation of asylums coincided with evolving societal attitudes towards mental health treatment. Architectural philosophy aimed to create therapeutic spaces conducive to healing, emphasizing specific design principles. The prevalent belief of the time was that the physical environment significantly impacted mental well-being and treatment outcomes. Victorian asylums were thus tailored to meet the diverse needs of patients with various mental disorders. Reflecting contemporary social attitudes and practical considerations, Victorian asylums incorporated elements from diverse architectural styles and movements, serving both functional and aesthetic purposes. In today’s context, repurposing Victorian asylums presents interesting challenges. This paper seeks to analyze the balance between preserving their architectural heritage while adapting them to modern needs, addressing challenges, successes, and ethical considerations. It explores ways to reintegrate these historically rigid structures into the architectural landscape, considering the possibilities and limitations of redesigning for contemporary uses while honoring their architectural legacy and societal impact. Their adaptive reuse blends historical significance with reinterpretation, exemplifying the nuanced application of the “form follows function” principle within architectural heritage and societal evolution.

Keywords

form, function, asylum, therapeutic space, adaptive reuse, heritage

Download

References

  1. Chaplin, R. & Peters, S. (2023) Executives have taken over the asylum: the fate of 71 psychiatric hospitals, Psychiatric Bulletin, 27.
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, Sage Publications.
  3. Digby, A. (1985). Madness, Morality and Medicine, Cambridge University Press.
  4. Dolan, L. (1987) Reuse of state hospital property, 1970–1985, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 38.
  5. Donnelly, M. (1983). Managing the Mind. A Study of Medical Psychology in Early Nineteenth Century Britain, Tavistock.
  6. Edginton, B. (1997). Moral architecture: the influence of the York Retreat on asylum design, Health and Place, vol. 3, no. 2.
  7. Edginton, B. (2003). The design of Moral Architecture at the York retreat, Journal of Design History, Vol.16, no.2, Oxford University Press.
  8. Ellis, R., Kendal, S., Taylor, S.J. (ed.) (2021). Voices in the History of Madness. Personal and professional Perspectives on Mental Health and Illness, Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Evans, R. (1982). The Fabrication of Virtue: English Prison Architecture, 1750-1840, Cambridge University Press.
  10. Franklin, B. (2002) Hospital - heritage - home: reconstructing the nineteenth century lunatic asylum, Housing, Theory and Society, 19(3-4).
  11. Golding. R. (2021). Music and Moral Management in the Nineteenth-Century English Lunatic Asylum, Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Gropius, W. (1965). The New Architecture and the Bauhaus, The MIT Press.
  13. Joseph, A. E., Kearns, R. A. & Moon, G. (2009) Recycling former psychiatric hospitals in New Zealand: echoes of deinstitutionalisation and restructuring, Health and Place, 15(1).
  14. Lang, J. T. (1974). Designing for human behavior: architecture and the behavioral sciences, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
  15. Lang, J. T. (1987). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
  16. Lipman, A. (1969). The architectural belief system and social behaviour, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 20, no. 2.
  17. Lowin, A., Knapp, M. & Beecham, J. (1998) Use of old long-stay hospital buildings, The Psychiatrist, 22.
  18. Noble, P. (1999). The Architecture of Madness: Buildings Can Drive You Crazy, But Can They Help Restore Mental Health?, Metropolis, 19.
  19. Pointon, M. (1997). Quakerism and visual culture, Art History, vol. 20, no. 3.
  20. Powell, J.E. (1961). The Water Tower Speech, Annual Conference: National Association for Mental Health, Brighton.
  21. Rabinow, P. (ed.) (1984). The Foucault Reader, Pantheon Books.
  22. Schneekloth, L. H., Feuerstein, M. F., & Campagna, B. A. (1992). Changing places: remaking institutional buildings, White Pine Press.
  23. Stewart, K. A. (1992). The York Retreat in the Light of the Quaker Way, William Sessions Limited.
  24. Topp, L., Moran, J., Andrews, J., (ed.) (2020) Madness, Architecture and the Built Environment. Psychiatric Spaces in Historical Context, Taylor&Francis.
  25. Weinberg, D. (1997). The social construction of non-human agency, Social Problems, vol. 44, no. 2.
  26. Weiner, D. (2004). The erasure of history: from Victorian asylum to Princess Park Manor, in: D. Arnold & A. Ballantyne (Eds),Architecture as Experience: Radical Change in Spatial Practice, Routledge.
  27. Woods, M. (1985). Thomas Jefferson and the University of Virginia: Planning the Academic Village, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 44, 266-283.
  28. Wynter, R., Wallis, J., Ellis, R. (ed.) (2023). Memory, Anniversaries and Mental Health in International Historical Perspective. Faith in Reform, Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Yanni, C. (2007). The Architecture of Madness: Insane Asylums in the United States, University of Minnesota Press.

Related articles

Raluca Manoliu
Review of “The Architecture Of Sitesynthesis” by Lino Bianco (University of Malta) (2024)