ro | en
ArgumentNo. 16/2024

Democratizing Access to Architecture: Between Automation and Creativity

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.16.04

  • / ”Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bucharest, RO

Abstract

The article explores the redefinition of the architect’s role in the era of emerging machine learning technologies, adding data curation as an essential stage in the design process. The research aims to explore how these technologies influence the relationship between architects and clients, and how integrating communication through new technologies like BIM and advanced visualization can transform the design process.

The analysis is conducted in three main stages: the first involves comparing market data from Romania and Europe to determine which architectural programs are most prevalent in the market and the level of adoption of new technologies in their development; the second stage involves identifying the client typologies of architectural offices; and the last stage analyzes the market segment of homes designed without an architect. The study’s methodology includes comparative data analysis, interviews with architects, and assessing the interactions between individuals building homes without the services of an architect.

Although the study is based on qualitative data, which limits the generalization of the results to the entire architectural market, the purpose is to formulate a series of hypotheses that require validation in order to develop a new work methodology that combines automation in architecture. The results of the comparative analysis show significant adoption of BIM and VR/AR technologies in Romania compared to the European average, also highlighting the need for optimizing communication between architects and clients.

The main contribution of this study lies in analyzing how emerging technologies, such as AI and BIM, influence the role of the architect and the dynamics of the relationship with clients. The study proposes new ways of interaction and highlights the impact of automation on democratizing access to architectural services.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, BIM, VR, automation

Download

References

  1. AIA. (2021). Stronger insights for stronger practices: 2021 client feedback report. Australian Institute of Architects. https://www.architecture.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Australian-Institute-of-Architects-Client-Feedback-Report-2021-FINAL.pdf 
  2. Beer, P., & Mulder, R. H. (2020). The effects of technological developments on work and their implications for continuous vocational education and training: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00918 
  3. Bolojan, D., Vermisso, E., & Yousif, S. (2022). Is language all we need? A query into architectural semantics using a multimodal generative workflow. In J. van Ameijde, N. Gardner, K. H. Hyun, D. Luo, & U. Sheth (Eds.), Post-carbon: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2022), (pp. 353–362). The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2022.1.353 
  4. Chaillou, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and architecture: From research to practice. Birkhäuser. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783035624045
  5. Cuff, D. (2023). Architectures of spatial justice. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14505.001.0001
  6. dPrix, W., Schmidbaur, K., Bolojan, D., & Baseta, E. (2022). The legacy sketch machine: From artificial to architectural intelligence. Architectural Design, 92(3), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2808
  7. Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial networks. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1406.2661 
  8. Johannessen, M. R. (2013). Social media as public sphere: An exploratory study of online political communication in Norway [Doctoral dissertation, University of Agder]. University of Agder. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269705063_Social_media_as_public_sphere_An_exploratory_study_of_online_political_communication_in_Norway 
  9. Mirza, A. (2023). The architectural profession in Europe: The ACE 2022 sector study. Architects’ Council of Europe. https://www.ace-cae.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/2022_Sector_Study_EN.pdf 
  10. Norouzi, N., Shabak, M., Embi, M. R. B., & Khan, T. H. (2015). The architect, the client and effective communication in architectural design practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.413 
  11. RIBA. (2015). Client & architect: Developing the essential relationship. Royal Institute of British Architects. https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/client-and-architect-developing-the-essential- relationship#available-resources    
  12. Woodcock, J. (2021). Technology, labor, and the gig economy. In D. A. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociology and digital media (pp. 178–194). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.14   
  13. Zabala-Vargas, S., Jaimes-Quintanilla, M., & Jimenez-Barrera, M. H. (2023). Big data, data science, and artificial intelligence for project management in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: A systematic review. Buildings, 13(12), 2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122944 
  14. Zamfira, R. (2022). Raport SiOAR 2022. Ordinul Arhitecților din România. https://oar.archi/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Raport-SIOAR-2022.pdf