ro | en
ArgumentNo. 15/2023

Alternative churches. From desacralization to adaptive-reuse

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.15.04

  • / Polytechnic University of Timișoara, Timișoara, RO

Abstract

The desacralisation of churches, as a widespread phenomenon in Europe, has left its mark on states with a prolific secular character, leaving room for intervention on the material religious heritage in an innovative way. The architect has thus the opportunity to shape the space of a church in a new way, with different mechanisms and techniques of intervention in order to adapt the inert tectonics to the new values of the contemporary world. The re-inclusion of non-functional churches in society through new architectural programmes inserted in their desacralised structural shell is the main aim of the initiative to preserve and refunctionalise it. The search for functional alternatives suitable for the new context for the old structure is the main challenge the architect faces in the design process. As each church is placed in a different context with its own social, cultural, economic and political characteristics, the process of refunctionalisation is one rooted in the specificity of the place. The process involves a number of experts from related fields, who work upon a diagnosis of the area and elaborate a suitable hypothesis to design a new function of the old church. Thus, from an empirical point of view, the materiality of the church continues, although the values it served have lost their relevance. It can accommodate new functions that meet the current needs of the neighbouring community. The challenge is to identify and manage the specific elements of each church as an architectural object at the confluence of several socio-economic factors and, secondly, to define an alternative solution for the originally sacred function.

Keywords

church, desacralisation, ruin, house of worship, values, renewal, reuse

Download

References

  1. Caballero, P. (2020, September 24). Tas’s Church / Garmendia Cordero Arquitectos. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/948226/tass-church-garmendia-cordero-arquitectos
  2. Caballero, P. (2022, December 30). Library, Museums and Community Center ‘De petrus’/Molennar&Bol&vanDillen Arhitects. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/892558/library-museum-and-community-center-de-petrus-molenaar-and-boland-
    vandillen-architects
  3. Code of Canon Law. (n.d). Cartea IV, Cap. I. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib4-cann1205-1243_en.html#CHAPTER_I.
  4. Crișan, R. (2017). The dilemma of the redundant churches: to lose or to reuse? În D. Fiorani, L. Kealy, & S. F. Musso (Eds.), EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education: Conservation, Adaptation, Keeping Alive the Spirit of the Place: Adaptive
    Reuse of Heritage with Symbolic Value, 65, 29-40
  5. Eliade, M. (2019). Sacrul si profanul. Ed. Humanitas.
  6. Hernández, D. (2020, July 23). Restaurant “The Jane” Antwerp / Piet Boon. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/494392/restaurant-the-jane-antwerp-piet boon?ad_source=myarchdaily&ad_medium=bookmark-show&ad_content=current-user
  7. Institutul Național de Statistică. (2013). Ce ne spune recesămăntul din anul 2011 despre religie?. https://insse.ro/cms/files/publicatii/pliante statistice/08-Recensamintele despre religie_n.pdf
  8. Institutul Național de Statistică. (2021). Recensământul populației și locuintelor runda 2021 – rezultate provizorii. https://insse.ro/cms/ro/content/recensământul-populației-și-locuințelor-runda-2021-rezultate-provizorii
  9. James, A. (2022). Building Community in Sacred Space: A Method for Adaptive Reuse of Deconsacrated Churches in Millbanck, New Brunswick. Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia.
  10. Kilde, J.H. (2008). Sacred Power, Sacred Space An introduction to Christian Architecture and Worship. Oxford University Press.
  11. Pew Research Center. (2018a). Being Christian in Western Europe. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/05/29/being-christian-in-western-europe/
  12. Pew Research Center. (2018b). Religious practice and belief. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/05/29/religious-practice-and-belief/
  13. Plevoets, B. si Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage. Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. Routledge, Taylor&Francis.
  14. Rojas, C. (2021, March 3). ‘De poort van Borne’ Healthcare Center / Reitsema & partners architecten. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/891009/de-poort-van-borne-healthcare-center-reitsema-and-partners-architecten?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab
  15. Smith, J. (1987). To take place Toward theory in ritual. University Press of Chicago and London.
  16. Tauwinkl, W. (2014). Chapter I: “Wellness” in Religion, a Way of Emptying Churches? În W. Dancă (Ed.), Faith and Secularization: A Romanian Narrative. Romanian Philosophical Studies, IX (Series IVA. Central and Eastern European Philosophical Studies, Volume 48, Series VIII. Christian Philosophical Studies, Volume 7). George F. McLean (General Editor). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. 11-24
  17. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  18. Wouters, E. (2021). Strategies for the re-activation of religious buildings as a common ground [Webinar]. Herrenhausen Symposium. https://ar-tur.be