ArgumentNo. 13/2021

The Plus Space, Versatility as Spatial Ambiguity, a Trigger for Creativity

  • / PhDc. arch., “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO


The context of the pandemic has forced us to rethink the way we live. Is a multifunctional space beneficial? How many functions can we fit in what floor area? What psychological consequences does a multi- vs a uni-functional space have over the way we live? To answer this question I will distinguish between unoccupied, un-assigned space, the +space, and the specific, ordered, and specifically-designed space.

I identify two necessary attributes for a space to be versatile: ambiguity and functionality. Ambiguity is a condition that facilitates the triggering of the creative process, being also the only one that has a direct correlation with creative potential in the specialty literature. We understand the functionality of a space in terms of fulfillment of basic physical and contextual conditions such as proportion, lighting, and position. As an example I will talk about the balcony, that forgotten border space that, when we realized we don’t have enough air, enough light, enough nature, enough visibility, became a whatever-space-we-needed: an office, a playground, a garden, a breakfast nook, an observation deck of the world outside the window. I will expand the meaning of the +space to macro level environments, such as public spaces, using two artistic installations I coordinated for Romanian Creative Week. I will use an interdisciplinary approach, combining architecture with behavioral psychology and creativity research. I conclude that, in parallel with assigned spaces, we must think a bit of extra space, a +space, that can offer an escape from the predetermined grid, a space in which we will not feel constrained to follow a set behavioral pattern.


ambiguity, versatility, functional merging, +space, creativity



  1. Campbell, M. (2005). What tuberculosis did for modernism: the influence of a curative environment on modernist design and architecture. Medical History, 49(4), 463–488.
  2. Dul, J. (2019). The Physical Environment and Creativity: A Theoretical Framework. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 481–510). Cambridge University Press
  3. Hakak, A. M. (2017). Enhancing [Spatial] Creativity: Enhancing creativity of architects by applying unconventional virtual environmentsitle. TU Delft.
  4. Judge, Lindsay and Rahman, F. (2020). Lockdown living : Housing quality across the generations. Resolution Foundation.
  5. Kaufman, J., & Glăveanu, V. (2019). A Review of Creativity Theories: What Questions Are We Trying to Answer?
  6. Milne, R., Condia, B., Manhattan, & Negami, H. (2020). Understanding the Effect of Spatial Ambiguity on Creative Modes of Thinking. 2. ANFA conference
  7. Paris, S. R. De, & Lopes, C. N. L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 80–91.
  8. Serafini, G., Parmigiani, B., Amerio, A., Aguglia, A., Sher, L., & Amore, M. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. Qjm, 113(8), 229–235.
  9. Sharma, N., & Vaish, H. (2020). Impact of COVID - 19 on mental health and physical load on women professionals: an  online cross-sectional survey. Health Care for Women International, 41(11–12)
  10. Sfinteș, A., Păduraru, R., Balcanu, R., David, D. (2019). “The Third Room”. Anthropological and Architectural Explorations. Habitation. Context and perspectives. Argument 11/2019