The Plus Space, Versatility as Spatial Ambiguity, a Trigger for Creativity
- Oana Frunză / PhDc. arch., “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO
The context of the pandemic has forced us to rethink the way we live. Is a multifunctional space beneficial? How many functions can we fit in what floor area? What psychological consequences does a multi- vs a uni-functional space have over the way we live? To answer this question I will distinguish between unoccupied, un-assigned space, the +space, and the specific, ordered, and specifically-designed space.
I identify two necessary attributes for a space to be versatile: ambiguity and functionality. Ambiguity is a condition that facilitates the triggering of the creative process, being also the only one that has a direct correlation with creative potential in the specialty literature. We understand the functionality of a space in terms of fulfillment of basic physical and contextual conditions such as proportion, lighting, and position. As an example I will talk about the balcony, that forgotten border space that, when we realized we don’t have enough air, enough light, enough nature, enough visibility, became a whatever-space-we-needed: an office, a playground, a garden, a breakfast nook, an observation deck of the world outside the window. I will expand the meaning of the +space to macro level environments, such as public spaces, using two artistic installations I coordinated for Romanian Creative Week. I will use an interdisciplinary approach, combining architecture with behavioral psychology and creativity research. I conclude that, in parallel with assigned spaces, we must think a bit of extra space, a +space, that can offer an escape from the predetermined grid, a space in which we will not feel constrained to follow a set behavioral pattern.
ambiguity, versatility, functional merging, +space, creativity
- Campbell, M. (2005). What tuberculosis did for modernism: the influence of a curative environment on modernist design and architecture. Medical History, 49(4), 463–488.
- Dul, J. (2019). The Physical Environment and Creativity: A Theoretical Framework. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 481–510). Cambridge University Press
- Hakak, A. M. (2017). Enhancing [Spatial] Creativity: Enhancing creativity of architects by applying unconventional virtual environmentsitle. TU Delft.
- Judge, Lindsay and Rahman, F. (2020). Lockdown living : Housing quality across the generations. Resolution Foundation.
- Kaufman, J., & Glăveanu, V. (2019). A Review of Creativity Theories: What Questions Are We Trying to Answer?
- Milne, R., Condia, B., Manhattan, & Negami, H. (2020). Understanding the Effect of Spatial Ambiguity on Creative Modes of Thinking. 2. ANFA conference
- Paris, S. R. De, & Lopes, C. N. L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 80–91.
- Serafini, G., Parmigiani, B., Amerio, A., Aguglia, A., Sher, L., & Amore, M. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population. Qjm, 113(8), 229–235.
- Sharma, N., & Vaish, H. (2020). Impact of COVID - 19 on mental health and physical load on women professionals: an online cross-sectional survey. Health Care for Women International, 41(11–12)
- Sfinteș, A., Păduraru, R., Balcanu, R., David, D. (2019). “The Third Room”. Anthropological and Architectural Explorations. Habitation. Context and perspectives. Argument 11/2019