ArgumentNo. 13/2021

Urban Context. Visual Communication. Graffiti as a Manifestation of Heterotopia

https://doi.org/10.54508/Argument.13.12

  • / PhD.c. arch., “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, RO
  • / Lecturer Phd arch., „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University, Iași, RO

Abstract

City and imaginary architectural space oscillate between two categories typological - utopia and dystopia, to which we can add the contemporary concept of heterotopia. Michel Foucault defines heterotopia as an actually realized utopia, a counter-location, a place outside any place, even if it is localizable. In contrast to utopia, heterotopia is a different kind of space, a mythical and at the same time real challenge of the space in which we live. There are two major types of heterotopias - crisis and deviation, but also a less common category of compensation heterotopias. What is offered to us is more than an illusion of another world, it is precisely a compensation for the shortcomings of evil, a world organized according to totally different values and criteria. The individual feels the need to express himself through alternative means, which over time we have come to call arts, such as graffiti. Starting from the visual aggression of buildings, deserted alleys and degraded public spaces and the psychological impact they have on the individual, we understand that urban space must be seen not only as a simple framework of manifestation, but also as a catalyst and generator of this social phenomenon. As in the case of any other work of art, the appreciation of a graffiti is influenced by the category of the observer, by his emotional connections with that place, by his training and intellectual structure. Graffiti and urban space influence each other, an aspect revealed by analyzing urban art through the prism of the concepts of heterotopia and the right to the city. Urban space often needs to be personalized, humanized, in the same way that one personalizes private space, one’s own home. It is a marking of the territory and a correction of a deficiency of contemporary architecture – depersonalization.

Keywords

utopia, dystopia, heterotopia, urban space, graffiti, street art

Download

References

  1. Antohi, S. (1991). Utopica. Studii asupra imaginarului social Poetica spaţiului. București: Ed. Științifică.
  2. Banksy (2009). Arta la zid / Wall and Piece  (trad. V. Sălăgeani). București: Vellant.
  3. Claeys, G. (2020). Utopia. The history of an idea. Londra: Thames & Hudson.
  4. Mihali, C. (coord.2001). Altfel de Spații. Studii de Heterotopologie. București: Paideia.
  5. Nae, C. (2015). Moduri de a percepe. O introducere în teoria artei moderne și contemporane. Iași: Ed. Polirom.
  6. Steward, S. (2001). Ceci Tuer Cela: Grafitti as Crime an Art. In J. Fekete (ed.) - Life After Postmodernism. Essay on Value and Culture; New World Perspectives (pp. 167–173). Montreal: CTheory Books.
  7. Zaimakis, Y. (2015). Welcome to the civilization of fear: On political graffiti heterotopias in Greece in time of crisis; In Visual Communication 2015, Vol 14(4), (pp. 373- 396).
  8. Zieleniec, A. (2016). The right to write the city: Lefebvre and graffiti. Environnement Urbain / Urban Environment [online], Volume 10 | 2016.
  9. Zieleniec, A. (2018). Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre. Urban Planning, Volume 3, Issue 3, (pp. 5–15).